🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the districts created after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling comes amid a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

Another top House figure said the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.