🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the perfect choice for a bold scary movie centered on the biblical figure, though not for the causes certain audiences could guess. Actually, Cage doesn't even play the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: the part he plays is credited merely as a craftsman. The actor is positioned as a father figure within this tale, attempting to keep his faith as The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), his now-teenage adopted son, begins to display supernatural abilities. The explanation it's hard to imagine another major actor in this role is that while his character grows burdened with various difficulties, Cage himself seems almost emotionally convinced that the murky, somber small film is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Latest Projects

Nicolas Cage was spending those years more judiciously lately. He yet does more films than most average viewers may ever watch — for example, are you aware that he has filmed several different frontier films recently? — but he also adds prestige A24/Neon gigs for example Dream Scenario, another notable movie, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son sounds like one of those, in that it’s borderline horror, possibly controversial, and handles a campy-sounding premise in a earnest manner.

The Film's Premise and Execution

Sadly, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not justify viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son begins with a interestingly wandering setting, presented as inspired by an obscure religious text regarding Christ’s childhood. Cage's character, The Mother, and their son move constantly, afraid of faith-based hostility or suspicion over The Boy’s strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. That continues as evil influences target the household at their new home, initiating on that well-known scriptural test for the son.

At times, the film echoes an Exorcist-style possession movie, though no one of the central roles are explicitly taken over. Instead, they grow progressively isolated mutually, when these forces influence a nearby girl (the actress, credited as “The Stranger”) that the son connects to, and presents all disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter especially struggles with his role in this story, sometimes scolding the boy he doesn't completely grasp.

Controversy and Caution

This material is apt to court controversy, and the director treats it with a lot of delicacy — too much, maybe. The concept of a young man facing his eventual sacrifice and tempted by unknown powers is truly scary, but Nathan may be hesitant regarding appearing sensational and keen to telegraph his goals, therefore he regularly falls back on gloomily threatening cinematography. Characters continually reflect — the singer-actress, who displayed notable talent in another movie, of all things — surrenders her performance to her religious attire, sometimes broken up by several gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Portrayal and Film's Shortcomings

At the same time, the actor toy with just the sort of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. An instance (shown) in previews in which he loses control and yells “My faith has been shattered!” Should such of florid outburst is included in your Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more openly absurd style would be more effective of Cage’s willingness to be extreme when necessary. Instead, the film more closely resembles the less successful direct-to-video productions he starred in during the 2010s — apart from the B-movies instead the dramas and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and often contain some select actor's highlights, but in the end seem like, well, low-budget DTV material.

Frankly, some of those, although simpler, were more watchable overall. Here is where I need to disregard my usual practice, not religious but career-related: Previously, a respected mentor persuaded me to eliminate words like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my reviewing language. Such terms communicate minimal other than a subjective and generically described restlessness, avoiding the job of vividly conveying the intellectual and sensation of viewing a particular movie. It's hard to communicate boredom without appearing dull personally. It’s no more expressive as labeling a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” that is.

Yet, I acknowledge, I grew weary throughout the film. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a churchy kind of boredom, not for this movie is preachy, but as it takes a kind of dutiful submission to watch it. Eventually in the beginning, this feature settles into a repetitive rhythm of simmering distress, and does not