🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a fresh game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features several notable adjustments:

• Every squad includes just 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players award full XP, while AI activities provide reduced XP.
• Only two locations are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, achievements, and stat tracking are disabled.

So essentially, this mode lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, since it gives more options for gamers seeking alternative ways to enjoy the game. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," states a response to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing idea," comments another. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," while another lists everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to practice, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," states a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase queue times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them halfway, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this mode as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.