🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.